By Roger V. Gould
This, he keeps, is simply because violence quite often happens whilst anyone desires to in attaining superiority or dominance over another individual, no matter if there is not any noticeable cause of doing so. In making the case for this unique notion, Gould explores a various diversity of examples, together with murders, blood feuds, vendettas, revolutions, and the typical disagreements that compel humans to behave violently. the result's an clever and provocative paintings that restores the learn of clash to the guts of social inquiry.
Read Online or Download Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict PDF
Similar violence in society books
The quantity starts with an outline through Herbert Kelman discussing reconciliation as detailed from similar strategies of clash payment and clash solution. Following that, the 1st component of the quantity makes a speciality of intergroup reconciliation as along with relocating past emotions of guilt and victimization (i.
"Twentieth-century struggle is a different cultural phenomenon and the final twenty years have visible major advances in our skill to conceptualize and comprehend the previous and the nature of recent technological conflict. on the vanguard of those advancements has been the re-appraisal of the human physique in clash, from the ethics of digging up First international struggle our bodies for tv programmes to the contentious political concerns surrounding the reburial of Spanish Civil battle sufferers, the relationships among the struggle physique and fabric tradition (e.
Additional info for Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict
R. Rivers, Kinship and Social Organization (London: Athlone, 1968); Bronislaw Malinowski, Argonauts of the Western Pacific (New York: Waveland, 1994); Theodore Caplow, "Rule Enforcement without Visible Means: Christmas Gift Giving in Middletown," American Journal of Sociology 89 (1984): 1306-23. 46 CHAPTER Two mal assignment of people to roles, informal "group structure" of this kind is principally observed sociometrically, that is, by observation of repeated interaction or occasionally by questionnaires.
The existence of formally organized authority—dominance backed up officially by other relations, themselves conditional on yet others, all described in official rules and procedures—suggests another way in which conflict can be more likely in some circumstances than others. Some contests for rank can be decided in isolation, that is, on the sole basis of the differences in strength, resolve, or skill at argument between the two persons directly involved. But in complex societies, and especially in adult life, such gladiatorial competition is the exception.
See Michelle Z. , Woman, Culture, and Society (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974), especially Michelle Z. "; see also James G. Flanagan, "Hierarchy in Simple 'Egalitarian' Societies," Annual Review of Anthropology18 (1989): 245-66; Marilyn Strathern, The Gender of the Gift (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990); Eleanor Leacock, "Women's Status in Egalitarian Society: Implications for Social Evolution," Current Anthropology 19 (1982): 247-76; Jane F. Collier, Marriage and Inequality in Classless Societies (Stanford: Stanford University 60 CHAPTER Two carry major implications for understanding conflict.